Feminism / LGBTQ / Race / Video Games

BioWare Hands a Straight Male Gamer His Ass on a Plate

Oh look. We’re infiltrating games. By “we,” I mean non-straight, non-white, non-males. Dragon Age II was outfitted with relationship possibilities, of any and all genders, where players even have the ability to have more than once romance at a time with the game’s characters. And a Straight White Male is unhappy about this. So unhappy that he deigned to write a strongly worded post to BioWare on their forums. I have some affection for BioWare. Even though they partook in creating what was possibly the most hated game in 2012, there was still a point after the fact that I was wandering around Sacramento and I came across one of their buildings. I walked around and around until I rustled up the courage to open the door and say hello, before realizing the building was locked, and it was actually Sunday. So it’s nice to know that BioWare is taking what is, so far, a rare stance on representing those who are typically not represented. But of course, this does not come without some pushback.

Here is the strongly worded post in question:

To summarize, in the case of Dragon Age 2, BioWare neglected their main demographic: The Straight Male Gamer.

I don’t think many would argue with the fact that the overwhelming majority of RPG gamers are indeed straight and male. Sure, there are a substantial amount of women who play video games, but they’re usually gamers who play games like The Sims, rather than games like Dragon Age. That’s not to say there isn’t a significant number of women who play Dragon Age and that BioWare should forgo the option of playing as a women altogether, but there should have been much more focus in on making sure us male gamers were happy.

Now immediately I’m sure that some male gamers are going to be like “YOU DON’T SPEAK FOR ME! I LOVE DRAGON AGE 2!”, but you have to understand, the Straight Male Gamer, cannot be just lumped into a single category.

Its ridiculous that I even have to use a term like Straight Male Gamer, when in the past I would only have to say fans, …

BioWare’s David Gaider responded in kind:

The romances in the game are not for “the straight male gamer”. They’re for everyone. We have a lot of fans, many of whom are neither straight nor male, and they deserve no less attention. We have good numbers, after all, on the number of people who actually used similar sorts of content in DAO and thus don’t need to resort to anecdotal evidence to support our idea that their numbers are not insignificant… and that’s ignoring the idea that they don’t have just as much right to play the kind of game they wish as anyone else. The “rights” of anyone with regards to a game are murky at best, but anyone who takes that stance must apply it equally to both the minority as well as the majority. The majority has no inherent “right” to get more options than anyone else.

More than that, I would question anyone deciding they speak for “the straight male gamer” just as much as someone claiming they speak for “all RPG fans”, “all female fans” or even “all gay fans”. You don’t. If you wish to express your personal desires, then do so. I have no doubt that any opinion expressed on these forums is shared by many others, but since none of them have elected a spokesperson you’re better off not trying to be one. If your attempt is to convince BioWare developers, I can tell you that you do in fact make your opinion less convincing by doing so.

And if there is any doubt why such an opinion might be met with hostility, it has to do with privilege. You can write it off as “political correctness” if you wish, but the truth is that privilege always lies with the majority. They’re so used to being catered to that they see the lack of catering as an imbalance. They don’t see anything wrong with having things set up to suit them, what’s everyone’s fuss all about? That’s the way it should be, any everyone else should be used to not getting what they want.

The truth is that making a romance available for both genders is far less costly than creating an entirely new one. Does it create some issues of implementation? Sure– but anything you try on this front is going to have its issues, and inevitably you’ll always leave someone out in the cold. In this case, are all straight males left out in the cold? Not at all. There are romances available for them just the same as anyone else. Not all straight males require that their content be exclusive, after all, and you can see that even on this thread.

Would I do it again? I don’t know. I doubt I would have Anders make the first move again– at the time, I thought that requiring all romances to have Hawke initiate everything was the unrealistic part. Even if someone decides that this makes everyone “unrealistically” bisexual, however, or they can’t handle the idea that the character might be bisexual if they were another PC… I don’t see that as a big concern, to be honest. Romances are never one-size-fits-all, and even for those who don’t mind the sexuality issue there’s no guarantee they’ll find a character they even want to romance. That’s why romances are optional content. It’s such a personal issue that we’ll never be able to please everyone. The very best we can do is give everyone a little bit of choice, and that’s what we tried here.

And the person who says that the only way to please them is to restrict options for others is, if you ask me, the one who deserves it least. And that’s my opinion, expressed as politely as possible.

For more on this idiot (including an updated response post in response to Gaider), go here.


6 thoughts on “BioWare Hands a Straight Male Gamer His Ass on a Plate

  1. Don’t you think this is just a case of an idiot getting a mic because people are paying (too much) attention to it? It’s a polarized opinion and clearly the dude has no head on his shoulders, so why do more than let Gaider’s response do its job and shut him down?

    • Because BioWare is getting good press for being LGBTQ-friendly. Even though Dragon Age II came out years ago, people are now talking about it again in the context of its inclusiveness. BioWare is being praised for doing something that, frankly, all game devs should already be doing. So for as long as we uphold people like Gaider, and shit on people like the angry Straight Male Gamer, the message will remain that way. Nobody’s reading SMG’s post and going: “YOU HEAR THAT? SMGs want MORE SMGs in games! Let’s get to work!” We should be calling attention to good examples and bad examples of gaming culture, and calling them out for what they are.

      • Well, we can’t go from zero to sixty in the blink of an eye. Progress has to be made in steps.
        But my argument is that we shouldn’t give attention to people like this dude who claims to be the voice of SMGs. Sure, Gaider deserves praise for putting the company’s good ideologies forth (especially as calmly and succinctly as he did), but as long as this SMG dude is relatively anonymous, I don’t think he’s gonna learn or change his views. He’s just getting more attention.

        • It’s really not about him, though. It’s about praising game devs for standing up to people like him. He’s just a necessary part of having that conversation. It really seems as though you are more concerned that he’s attempting to speak for your demographic. People do this to minorities all the time, and it is just as untrue for minority demographics than it is for the privileged majority.

  2. Pingback: Oh God! What do we do. There are men humping other men in the world!!!! | Observations of Daily Stupidity

  3. Pingback: video games for the rest of us | kuntsrule

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s