Feminism / Movies / Music / TV

Are We Witnessing the Rebranding of Feminism?

emma watson

After watching reactions from Emma Watson’s UN speech this weekend, I couldn’t help but think, “Whoa, whoa, did feminism just go mainstream?” Well maybe. Also, well maybe some type of feminism. But let’s not get caught up in that quite yet. Even in the age of Shailene Woodley’s clunky and disappointing answer to the “Do you consider yourself a feminist?” bait question (and let’s be real, every female celebrity is going to get baited from now on), there are mainstream celebrities out there who have embraced the term and have begun doing work on it.

There are discussions up the wazoo about whether feminism is too alienating, whether it needs rebranding, or whether it’s too synonymous with man-hating. I’m of the school of thought that women demanding most things (rights or otherwise) will be interpreted as militant man-haters, and seen as alienating, simply due to sexism that polices women’s behavior. So there really is no need to change the word “feminism” since the word isn’t the root of the problem. And yet, the way feminism has been easing itself again into popular culture, and therefore again into American consciousness, makes me wonder if a rebranding is exactly what is happening.

For every Shailine Woodley or Katy Perry, there is an equally likeable and well respected celebrity that self-identifies as feminist. The first to become especially visible to those around my age is probably Amy Poehler, who made her politics no secret when she began her side project Smart Girls. There was also the trendy Lena Dunham. More recently there has been Beyonce, who has arguably not only had a hand in rebranding feminism, but who has also used it for her personal brand. Beyonce was previously under attack for her brand of feminism, but she arguably had the greatest reach in terms of putting the word on everyone’s tongue.

beyonce

beyonce the riveter

Laverne Cox is another figure who changed the game, not only advocating for feminism, but doing so under the lens of queer and trans women of color. When Orange is the New Black became a hit, her character stuck with audiences as charismatic, sympathetic, and honestqualities that translated offscreen and which went directly into her political activism.

There’s Joseph Gordon Levitt, who takes the “scary” mask off the word feminism, and says there’s really nothing to be afraid of. As a man, he’s not afraid. He talks about his mother, a second wave feminist, with the charming half-squint that makes everything he says sound sincere. He also uses his own project, HitRecord, to open up a dialogue with viewers and fans, inviting them to discuss what feminism means to them. He invites those who do not consider themselves feminists to participate, which definitely encourages participation from so-called egalitarian viewers who wrongly advocate for humanism, but also opens up a conversation for women of color or queer people who have previously felt left out of the feminist movement. The form is particularly inclusive and less top-down than a lot of feminist conversations.

And now most recently there’s Emma Watson, whose UN speech from this past weekend made her come off as somewhat of an adult Hermione Granger. She is a celebrity who is seen as thoughtful, learned, and who people either want or want to be. To some it feels like pandering. It feels like wrapping feminism up in a way that appeals to men when in fact it was never about men in the first place, and never should be. While I and many others are skeptical of the HeForShe brand, Emma Watson has made it clear that her goal is to recruit allies and open up feminism to men in a way that acknowledges the way men suffer under traditional gender roles, but also urges them to be advocates for women and take responsibility.

What does rebranding mean for feminism? There are definite risks. Traditionally, rebranding often nullifies the previous “brand,” which risks erasure of the efforts that have been made before. On the other hand, rebranding can breathe new life into a company, or in this case, a movement. While feminists like me will have a lingering worry about who still gets left out of the movement, I can’t help but get a little excited that these conversations seem to be gaining traction in a positive way. It’s still important to have a human face to feminism, especially when these faces belong to people who are already considered likeable, reasonable, and on your side, rather than people who are considered antagonizing or superfluous. This is by no means diminishing the efforts of feminists such as Anita Sarkeesian, for example, who are constantly at the ire of men, despite being basically right about everything. I do still believe divisive feminists serve to push a movement (and movements should always be pushed). But the more people sign on to feminism due to a change in perception, the more the perception changes, like a feedback loop. I wonder if this is what is happening now. I want to be optimistic. I want to view these as successes, and I guess I tentatively do.

Advertisements

9 thoughts on “Are We Witnessing the Rebranding of Feminism?

  1. It is not responsible to turn what Emma Watson said as a Global Ambassador into a debate about “branding” or “re-branding” because equality for women is not a product. Beyonce turned it into a product and that is grossly irresponsible. As in she grossed a lot of money off of female oppression while there are 200 girls who have been kidnapped from Nigeria as punishment for GOING TO SCHOOL. This is a joke to the kidnappers. http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/video/malala-michelle-obamas-effort-bring-kidnapped-girls-home-24560736. Beyonce could have donated ALL the money from her “feminist” campaign to RETURNING THOSE GIRLS. Those girls have not returned and that was almost 3 months ago. Many feminists for centuries have been asking MEN to get involved in the campaign to bring equality to women. Eve Ensler has been asking men to get involved for over a decade but no one will listen because she says the word vagina out loud. Emma Watson is not rebranding anything, she is asking men to get involved in the feminist movement because that’s what makes sense sociologically as a proper solution. Is this the first time you have heard of getting men involved, when Hermoine Granger said it? This article is just….why? SMH.

  2. I actually really enjoyed this article, and think that it has a lot of good points. While I do agree that Beyonce’s feminism has a couple of very glaring flaws (for example the problematic lines in her song “Surfboard” that seemingly mock Tina Turner’s physical abuse), she is still creating an outlet for communication about feminism, and therefore the issues it deals with. I’m glad that more people are talking, and that most of it actually seems to be positive. I don’t think Emma Watson should necessarily be the face of this new wave of feminism, if that’s even what this is, but I don’t think she’s a bad place to start either. That isn’t to say that people before her haven’t advocated the same thing, but would you just rather that we never mention those issues again because someone already brought them up?

    • I’m guessing that is a rhetorical question based on my lengthy comment, which was about having a responsible dialogue, by the way, not no dialogue. As a lawyer I see the flawed logic in this piece and voiced my disappointed opinion. Just like you are voicing your opinion about how you thought this was enjoyable despite it’s glaring flaws.

  3. Pingback: Equality – He for She | Naomi Chen

  4. As a first thing, I must say that I think the article has very well delivered. Secondly, regarding Emma’s UN speech, I must confess that I strongly support her words and that I believe that these have been a bit misunderstood: she never really said that the term should be reclaimed for it to be about men. Rather, she called out for men to become involved so the campaign will gain enough strength to have a tangible impact on global society. Personally, I think this manner of tackling the problem has absolute sense. If one thinks about it, the main reason why women suffer these preposterous conditions in civilised modern society is that the role of men and the idea of what constitutes a man advocate, in one way or another, for men superiority. That being said, it makes total sense that reshaping the idea of the masculine and all other conceptions regarding the male sex would, by extension, have an effect on the manner that we perceive the opposite gender.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s